TOWN OF WATERTOWN
Regular Meeting
Municipal Building
January 8, 2026
Members Present: Joel R. Bartlett, Supervisor
David D. Prosser, Councilman
Joanne McClusky, Councilwoman
Michael Perkins, Councilman
Robert Slye, Councilman
Members Absent:
Supervisor Bartlett opened the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance followed by a roll call of members present at 7:00 pm. Attorney Harrienger was also present.
MOTION #1-2026
Supervisor Bartlett moved to adopt the minutes from the December 17, 2025 Rescheduled Regular Board Meeting, Councilman Prosser seconded.
Ayes All
Supervisor Bartlett opened the public hearing in connection with Local Law No. 1 of 2026 entitled “A Local Law for the Prohibition of Clutter, Litter, and Debris,” at 7:05 p.m.
No one wished to speak. The public hearing was closed at 7:06 p.m.
Mike Altieri, BCA approached the Board. He updated the Board on the status of the water and sewer projects in the town.
PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION
Water District No. 4 Extension (Northland Estates/Pine Meadows)
Construction Budget: $ 7,250,000.00
Administrative and Technical Costs: $ 1,709,500.00
Contingency: $ 1,040,500.00
Total Project Cost: $10,000,000.00
Total Grant Funding (WIIA and CDBG): $ 6,250,000.00
Project Bid Results:
Contract No. 1 – Pipeline Construction $ 5,790,920.00 – JL Excavation
Contract No. 2 – Tank Aeration System NO BIDDERS ($250,000 Cost Opinion)
Contract No. 3 – Electrical Construction $ 44,870.00 – Blackstone Electric
Mr. Altieri, for disclosure purposes, informed the Board that the owner of Blackstone Electric is the coach of his son’s football team.
Projected Construction Substantial Completion Date: December 2026
Project Update -This project has received approval from NYS DOH and the Bureau of Health.
Easements are being obtained for affected property owners. Comments from DOT have been responded to and we anticipate project approval forthcoming soon. An extension request for the CDBG grant has been submitted and accepted by OCR. BCA is currently working through the post bid documentation phase and is reviewing the bid information with the funding agencies.
SPECIAL NOTE ON OUTSTANDING TOWN AFRs:
For all projects funded in the Town by EFC, including WD#4 Extension and SD#1 Improvements, EFC is requiring that the Town complete and file its outstanding AFRs for the last two years (2023 and2024) in order to close on financing with their agency.
Town wide Sewer (Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) I & l and Pipeline Improvements
This project effort will be combined with the new sewer alignment from SD No. 2 into the City of Watertown WWT and the new sewer alignment of the Town’s sewer on the Circle K property. Lawman has indicated that construction on this project could progress this April once all project documentation has been agreed to and executed.
Project Bid Results:
Contract No. 1 – Pipeline Construction $ 376,818.00 – Lawman Heating & Cooling
Sewer District No. 1
Total Project Cost: $ 2,643,000.00 (WWTF Replacement)
Project Funding Awarded: $ 4,491,000.00 (Stormwater Improvements)
NYS EFC WIIA – $ 444,500.00, NYS DEC WQIP – $ 1,000,000.00 (WWTF)
NYS EFC GIGP – $945,000 Grant (Stormwater)
Project Update – The Town has received an amended Consent Order has been sent to the Town from NYS DEC. This needs to be signed, notarized and sent back to NYS DEC by January 9th. The Town continues to roll forward with the grant closings for both the WQIP and GIGP grants received.
Sewer District No. 1 Revised Schedule per NYS DEC Amended Consent Order:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Respondent: Town of Watertown
No. R6-20190315-07A
SCHEDULE A
The above-referenced Respondent shall, on or before the dates indicated:
REQUIRED ACTION
- Submit approvable Final Basis of Design, Plans, Specifications, and a Construction Schedule for the implementation of the recommended disinfection system, wastewater treatment system, and storm water collection system improvements. The design documents shall clearly include Respondent’s preferred alternatives and include a schedule for implementation of the corrective actions, which shall become and enforceable part of this First Amended Order. The schedule shall incorporate, at a minimum, the due dates in this First Amended Order.
*On or before October 1, 2026
- Submit a written P.E. Certificate of Construction Completion for the disinfection system.
*On or before April 15, 2027
- Submit a written P.E. Certificate of Construction Completion for the wastewater
treatment system and storm water collection system improvements.
*On or before December 30, 2027
PROJECTS IN DEVELOPMENT
Sewer District 4, 5 and 6 Engineering Planning Grant Study – The EPG is in the stages of grant closure with NYS EFC. This study will examine additional upgrades that may need to be undertaken related to these districts.
Water Districts 3, 4 and 5-A combination of aging infrastructure and regulatory issues on the horizon will necessitate upgrades and potential consolidation of these districts.
Stormwater WQIP Grant – As an MS4 the Town will likely be eligible to apply for a vacuum truck to assist the Highway Department in maintaining the storm water system. The application period will likely open in May.
MOTION #2-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to authorize the Supervisor to sign the Executive Consent Order from the NYS DEC as responded for the Town of Watertown. Councilman Prosser seconded.
Ayes All
The Consent Order was sign by the Supervisor, notarized by the Clerk and Mr. Altieri will deliver the NYS DEC tomorrow.
Ryan Aubertine, GYMO updated the Board on water projects:
Northeast Water District No. 7
- Working on Easement Maps for a Public Hearing, date to be determined.
- Reached out to Gary Smith’s lawyer about AG&M’s request, awaiting response from Mr. Smith.
Attorney Harrienger reported that the she contacted Gary Smith’s attorney regarding the lateral restriction. Attorney Geurtsen advised that, while Mr. Smith currently has no plans to further develop his property beyond its minimal existing development, he does not wish to restrict himself from potential future development. Mr. Smith requested that, should a restriction be imposed in the future, he asked the Town waive any future annual water costs. This request was declined, consistent with prior decisions made by the Board for similar requests. She let Attorney Geurtsen know she would discuss the matter with the Town Board for further direction on their position on the matter. It was further noted that, based on the engineer’s review, the current situation does not provide a solution that would allow the Town to move forward at this time.
Mr. Aubertine reported that he contacted the Department of Agriculture and Markets and was advised that the lateral restriction applies only while a property remains within an agricultural district. If a property leaves the agricultural district, the lateral restriction would no longer apply. It was noted that agricultural district enrollment is reviewed on an eight-year cycle, and therefore the restriction is not permanent as previously believed.
Discussion followed regarding the impact of this on moving the project forward. It was confirmed that the property remains within the agricultural district at this time and that the easement has not yet been signed. There was uncertainty as to where the property falls within the current eight-year review cycle. It was suggested that Town staff follow up with Mr. Smith and his attorney to determine his status within the cycle and whether opting out is feasible.
Mrs. Desormo comment that the County has recently updated the agricultural district map for the current eight-year period and that no changes were made within the Town’s district. As a result, the next opportunity for changes would be approximately eight years from now. Alternative options that would not involve the affected property were discussed, along with questions regarding the process required for a property owner to opt out of an agricultural district.
Mr. Aubertine clarified that the lateral restriction would allow the property owner to connect to the water main at the time of installation, but would restrict any future additional connections unless the property leaves the agricultural district. Any future subdivision would require the owner to address that process independently, and it would not be a Town responsibility.
Supervisor Bartlett suggested proceeding with the original project plan as designed, allowing one hookup as shown in the approved maps and planning reports, and leaving any future changes to be mitigated by the property owner.
Attorney Harrienger raised concerns that this approach may not fully satisfy the Department of Agriculture and Markets, whose position is focused on ensuring that no future actions inconsistent with the lateral restriction occur while the property remains in the agricultural district. It was noted that Agriculture and Markets may still require formal adoption of the lateral restriction policy while allowing one hookup if the easement is signed.
Supervisor Bartlett reflected concern over regulatory limitations impacting municipal infrastructure projects, particularly given the prevalence of idle farmland, and the impracticality of delaying the project for the duration of the eight-year agricultural district cycle. He suggested proceeding with the project as designed, address future issues if and when they arise, and not delay progress based on uncertain future requirements.
Attorney Harrienger will consult with Mr. Smith’s legal counsel and communicate the Board’s position to the property owner regarding the single hookup and related requirements.
It was clarified that the original plan did not provide for multiple hookups, but rather a single hookup. Concern was expressed that the Department of Agriculture and Markets may require a more definitive action from the Town before allowing the project to proceed, and that approval could still be withheld if the Department determined the proposal to be improper. While one hookup may be permitted if a lateral restriction policy is enforced, uncertainty remained as to whether that would fully satisfy Agriculture and Markets.
Following discussion, the Board agreed to leave the matter tabled for the time being, pending further communication with the property owner. The expectation was that additional information would be available by the next meeting.
Discussion then moved to the proposed Lettiere Tract Water System. Supervisor Bartlett expressed concern that the volume and complexity of recently received materials, including multiple resolutions and alternative district configurations, did not allow sufficient time for proper review. He suggested a special meeting to allow the Board sufficient time to review the material. The Board tabled any action on Water District 7 and the proposed Lettiere Tract purchase.
MOTION #2-2026
Supervisor Bartlett moved to schedule a Special Meeting for Tuesday, January 27, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. The meeting is to review and possibly take action on the proposed purchase of the Lettiere Tract Water System and any other town business that comes before the Board. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
EASEMENT SUMMARY TABLE UPDATE
Total Signed
Force Main and Water Service 72 41
Force Main Only 5 1
Water Service Only 68 30
Lettiere/Southside Water
- Fact sheet (cliff notes) provided to Town Board 11.12.25.
- Engineering Report provided to Town Board 12.2.25.
- See User Cost Summary.
Southside (Lettiere) Water System
User Cost Summary
Given: Revenue Bond Term 10 years @ 3.44%
Potential Purchase Price $500,000
Soft Cost & Repair Allowance $175,000
Water Cost $/Unit $6.00
Water Cost 1000 Gal $8.02
Annual Water Cost @ 175 gpd $512
Variables: 1. Ad Valorem vs EDU District
- Ad Valorem Capital Cost based on average District Assessment of $132,025
- Consider with and without Prime, LLC (Ives Golf Course) Property
- Use 0.5 EDU of Vacant Property
Annual Capital Cost Annual Annual Total Cost
District Cost w/o PrimeLLC w/Prime LLC Water Costw/oPrime w/Prime
Ad Valorem District
$675,000 $674 $668 $512 $1186 $1180
(Alt #2) (Alt #3)
Billable Entities EDU
Residence (SFH&T) 118 118
Vacant Parcels 11 5.5
Totals 129 *123.5
*Total EDU’s shows only Southside (Lettiere) Water System
EDU $675,000 $655 $653 $512 $1167 $1165
(Alt #4) (Alt #5)
Note: Each Alternative is over the 2025 OSC Threshold of $1101 for the cost for an EDU in a Water District. Therefore, OSC approval is required which historically is a process taking over 12 months with the Town Attorney confirming over 20 months for a recent project.
*Since this report has been put together the OSC Threshold has been raised to $1213for the year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett opened the floor for public comment:
Jack Bradley Snyder, Orchard Drive thanked the Town for the work completed toward the potential acquisition of Southside Water LLC and expressed appreciation for the determination that the project appears financeable, including the possibility of a ten-year term at an interest rate of 3.44%. However, the acquisition-related costs have increased over time, including legal and engineering fees, contingencies, prior extension concepts, and the newly identified need for meter replacements, which were not fully known at the outset.
Mr. Snyder acknowledged and supported the Board’s skepticism and due diligence in protecting the interests of the public and ratepayers, and thanked Town Counsel for navigating the process with the Comptroller’s Office. Concern was expressed that additional costs and potential Comptroller approval issues could further delay the project, resulting in continued deterioration of the system.
He suggested that the Board consider making a written purchase offer to the owner, contingent upon Board approval, noting that an offer below the owner’s asking price could be reasonable given depreciation and recent system failures. It was stated that making such an offer would place the decision with the owner and potentially avoid prolonged delays, while also protecting the Board from criticism should the offer be declined. He concluded by reiterating appreciation for the Board’s efforts, recognizing that support among Board members is not unanimous, and expressing intent to attend the Special Meeting scheduled for January 27th.
Supervisor Bartlett stated without formation of a water district, the Town cannot levy charges against a district to recoup funds already invested in evaluating the system. It was emphasized that recovery of those costs is only possible once a district is formally established, underscoring the importance of defining both the district and its boundaries before proceeding further.
He noted that the additional costs discussed exceed the owner’s requested purchase price and reiterated that it would be premature to submit a purchase offer before a district is formed. It was stated that these matters would be addressed at the Special Meeting scheduled for January 27th, with any potential purchase discussions to follow thereafter, possibly in February, as additional procedural steps remain. He acknowledged the length and complexity of the process, particularly with older infrastructure systems. He feels confidence that both the Comptroller’s Office and the Public Service Commission would ultimately be supportive once the district formation is considered.
Joe Meyer, Co. Rte.60 addressed the Board regarding the proposed connector road across from Town Center Drive. Mr. Meyer asked whether the residence adjacent to the proposed roadway, owned by the developer, is located within the right-of-way of the new road and would need to be relocated. It was confirmed that the structure would need to be moved and that the cost would be the responsibility of the property owner. It was further stated that the demolition of the structure would occur prior to the connection road being constructed.
Mr. Meyer asked whether it would demonstrate good faith for the developer to address the relocation before the Town expends any funds on the road. The Supervisor responded that this had been the plan.
Mr. Meyer also inquired whether extending water service down the proposed road would require an extension of an existing water district. It was explained that the parcel in question is not currently within a water district and that an extension would be required to provide water service. Mr. Meyer formally requested that, if a water district extension is pursued, the remainder of Co. Rte. 60 (Floral Drive) also be considered for inclusion, noting that he made a similar request previously 10 years ago. He asked that this request be entered into the record. The Supervisor stated that the request would be considered.
Ben Shoen, Academy Street, but also owns property in the Town, addressed the Board regarding the proposed connector road. Mr. Shoen expressed concern over the use of public funds, including Federal American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, to construct a road that he believes primarily benefits one private development. He questioned whether accident data or other safety justifications supported the project and stated that, in his view, constructing a road for a developer could constitute an improper gift of public funds. Mr. Shoen noted that, based on his experience in construction, developers typically build roads and infrastructure themselves and then dedicate them to the municipality, rather than the municipality building roads for private benefit.
The Supervisor responded that the funds proposed for the project are ARPA funds allocated to the Town, with a deadline to use the funds by December 31, 2026, and that such funds are specifically authorized for infrastructure projects including roads, water, sewer, and related improvements. It was explained that a portion of the road costs would also be recovered from developers as parcels are developed, with contributions placed into a designated account to offset construction expenses. The Supervisor further noted that the road would serve multiple parcels and future owners, not solely the current property owner, and that the project would address longstanding access and frontage issues associated with the previously established paper street.
Mr. Shoen reiterated his concern that the project does not provide a broad community benefit and argued that public funds would be better directed toward existing infrastructure needs. Additional comments were made regarding the appropriateness of municipalities participating in infrastructure development to facilitate private development.
Mr. Meyer informed the Board that one of the parcels adjacent to the proposed road is currently listed for sale at approximately $1.75 million and questioned the fairness of using public funds to improve access for high-value private undeveloped property. He maintained his opposition to the project, stating that alternative uses of the funds would better serve the community.
Supervisor Bartlett responded that the funds in question are not derived from local tax increases but from federal allocations, and stated that the Town has continued to invest significantly in existing road infrastructure through the regular budget and equipment purchases. It was acknowledged that some ARPA funds will need to be reallocated from prior proposed uses to fund the connector road project. He stated “This is not Mr. Simao’s private property; you’re dealing with town-owned property. The town owns the land where this road is proposed to go”.
Mr. Meyer responded this did not exist historically as a town road. It was gifted to the town by the developer specifically for the purpose of development. As part of that arrangement, the developer also agreed to contribute $25,000 of his own money toward developing the road that he had just conveyed to the town. He stated “To my understanding, the town has only owned this road for a relatively short period. The road was gifted under the premise that the town would assist in developing access to serve the developer’s properties”. He believes this situation should be treated similarly to how they handle an extension of a water district. If a homeowner wants a water service and lives 100 feet from the main, it is incumbent upon that homeowner to pay for the extension from the main to their property then gift that infrastructure back to the town.
William Pfaff, NYS Route 232, expressed support for the purchase of the Lettiere Tract Water System. He stated that this represents a very good value and that it is time to move forward with the purchase. Having grown up in the Lettiere Water District, he noted that James Lettiere Sr. built the original district to high standards in the mid-1950s. While similar city water lines are approximately 150 years old, this system is only about 75 years old. He added that everyone who owns a home in this district appreciates the quality of construction and that Mr. Lettiere Sr. built a solid infrastructure.
Tamar Draper, Homestead Quality Homes, addressed the board regarding a client planning to place a manufactured home on Hunt Street, within the proposed Water District 7. She inquired about the process and timeline for connecting to the water system, including costs associated with installation, such as a meter pit. She noted prior discussions with staff members, including the Clerk and GYMO, and sought guidance on when the water service would be available so her client could proceed with placing the home.
Mr. Aubertine stated construction on the project is anticipated to begin in the spring; however, obtaining easements is the primary factor currently holding it back.
Ms. Draper noted that she was given an easement for her client, who has limited English proficiency and therefore requires assistance in understanding the process. She asked whether her client will be responsible for the cost of the meter pit so that he can begin banking arrangements and plan accordingly.
Mr. Aubertine responded another session for collecting easement signatures from property owners is planned toward the end of the month, though the exact date is yet to be determined. Ms. Draper was advised that attending this session would provide charts and information to give homeowners a rough estimate of costs, which will depend on factors such as home value and other site-specific considerations.
Rob Gayne, Swan Road, expressed concern about the cost of the connection road project off NYS Rte. 3. He noted that while lots may eventually sell, the current market is declining, which could delay progress. He referenced previous discussions in the minutes regarding the project cost, noting estimates ranging from $250,000 to possibly $400,000, depending on input from the town highway department. He questioned where the additional funds would come from; especially since ARPA funding of $100,000 alone would not cover the full cost.
Supervisor Bartlett explained that the funds must be allocated by December 31, 2026, to cover the project. The town is in the process of taking over the eminent domain of the main entrance into Sam’s Club. He stated approximately 85% of the road already exists as an existing driveway, which the town will assume responsibility for. He noted that the funding plan includes $100,000 from ARPA, with other funding sources to cover the remaining costs. He explained that for the property in question, each lot sold will contribute, as part of the site plan review process, to an escrow account to help cover a portion of the road construction costs.
Mr. Gayne raised concerns about market activity, noting that one lot is currently listed for $1.75 million and questioned whether there is any real interest in purchasing it stating it’s been listed since 2019.
Supervisor Bartlett responded that there has been, though specific details cannot be shared publicly. Development has been limited because the lots do not meet road frontage requirements necessary for new construction, currently 250 feet is required for commercial properties. Previous partial acquisitions, such as the credit union purchase, prevented full development of the remaining parcels. He further explained that the Planning Board established a paper street to provide the necessary road frontage for development. Once the paper street is constructed, developers will be able to build and contribute funds toward the road, offsetting the initial costs fronted by the town.
Mr. Gayne expressed concern that the town may need to front funds for an extended period before recovering costs from future lot sales. He asked where he would get the other $50,000 from. What budget line is it coming out of?
Supervisor Bartlett clarified that $100,000 of federal funds (American Rescue Plan Act, ARPA) has been allocated toward the project. Additionally, there may be up to $50,000 available for reallocation from other ARPA funds, though the board may choose to allocate less than the full amount. The work could be completed by the town’s Highway and Public Works departments at no cost to their existing budget, or it could be contracted out. The exact amount will depend on the board’s decision. He stated preliminary engineering and survey work indicate the cost of connecting the road to Route 202 would be minimal, as much of the necessary infrastructure already exists.
Mr. Gayne asked about taking the road through the swamp by Sam’s.
Supervisor Bartlett responded there is no swamp on this property. He stated “That determination has already been made. The site has been reviewed, surveyed, and inspected. They have had the DEC, the State DOT, and other relevant agencies on site, and all have confirmed that this is not a wetland area”.
He commented that this property is not a “gift,” as some have suggested. It is a developable asset, and that distinction is important. If the town does not continue to grow its tax base, we will fall behind. He used the example of the Salmon Run Mall. It was once assessed at $48 million and is now assessed at $9 million. That loss has a significant impact. Sales tax revenue is determined based on the taxable assessed value of property within the town. Currently, the town’s total assessed value is approximately $310 million. Before the recession, COVID, and other economic impacts would have been well over $500 million.
Those events slowed growth considerably, and they are now working to catch up. To do that, the town needs developable property so new businesses can locate here. This is something that is actively being managed and worked on every day.
Supervisor Bartlett said costs could ultimately be lower than anticipated. That said, the figures being discussed are not arbitrary. The engineer present has conducted surveys in the area and is familiar with the value of the property that was conveyed to the town. They understand what it will cost to construct the road, including the requirement for a highway work permit to connect to Route 3.These numbers are based on professional analysis and expert input, not estimates pulled out of thin air. He relies on the work and expertise of the professionals involved.
Mr. Gayne asked Mike Altieri, Town Engineer how much he thought the road would cost. The past minutes suggested $250,000 – $400,000. He feels that money should be used for improvements to existing roads in the town.
Mr. Altieri responded that he didn’t want to comment at this time.
Supervisor Bartlett stated they have included funds in the budget for the improvement to the town roads that Superintendent Clement has requested for.
Julie Gayne, Swan Road addressed the board to comment on the proposed road project. She commented these are federal funds, while they have been referred to as “free money,” there is no such thing as truly free money. This is a grant, and with that comes responsibility. The purpose of these funds is to benefit the residents of the town. They are intended to be used to upgrade, repair, and replace town infrastructure, whether that be roads, water systems, or sewer systems, projects that provide a town-wide benefit.
Over the past several months, during budget discussions and preparation, there has been repeated concern about financial pressures and future costs. These funds represent an opportunity to address some of those pressures through one-time investments that can reduce long-term costs and provide stability moving forward.
This needs to be viewed as a long-term strategy, not a short-term decision. Using these funds wisely can help stabilize future budgets, make the work of budget development easier, and create a more predictable financial outlook for the town. That stability encourages growth, because residents and businesses are more willing to invest when the town’s financial footing is secure.
The question driving this discussion is whether we are utilizing these funds to their fullest potential to benefit the town not just today, but well into the future. These opportunities may not come around again in this form, and they can help alleviate the stress and burden that comes with building the 2026 budget and those that follow. Budgeting will not become easier in 2027 or 2028 without thoughtful, long-range planning starting now.
No one else wished to speak; the floor was closed.
The Board took a 10 minute recess at 8:15 pm.
The meeting resumed at 8:25 pm.
Supervisor Bartlett accepted the Town Clerk’s Report.
MOTIONS/RESOLUTIONS
MOTION #3-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to accept and authorize the bid for the Extension of Water District #4 for Contract No. 1 – Pipeline Construction in the amount of $5,790,920.00, to JL Excavation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #4-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to accept and authorize the bid for the Extension of Water District #4 for Contract No. 3 – Electrical Construction $44,870.00 to Blackstone Electric. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #5-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to accept and authorize the bid for improvements to town wide Sewer Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Contract No. 1 – Pipeline Construction $376,818.00 to Lawman Heating & Cooling. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #6-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to put out for a rebid for Contract Number 2, Water District #4 Extension a contract for the Tank Aeration System. All bids to be received no later than 2:00 p.m. in February 12, 2026. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
The Board viewed the reviewed the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 concerning the Repeal and Replacement of Prohibition of Clutter, Litter and Debris Local Law #1 of 2026.
MOTION #7-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to accept the findings of the Full Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1, concerning the repeal and replacement of the Prohibition of Clutter, Litter, and Debris Local Law No. 1 of 2026. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #8-2026
RESOLUTION 1 of 2026
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SEQR (Long Form)
FOR PROHIBITION OF CLUTTER, LITTER, AND DEBRIS
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Watertown, New York has considered the adoption of Legislation in the Town of Watertown in connection with a prohibition of clutter, litter, and debris; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Watertown has reviewed an Environmental Assessment Form for the purpose of assisting the Town Board in making a determination of significance in respect to the Legislation; of whether the enactment of the Legislation would have a significant adverse impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Town has reviewed the criteria for determining significance of an action that is set forth at 6 NYCRR §617.7(c); and
WHEREAS, having considered the action, consisting of the adoption of the Legislation and the potential environmental impacts associated with such action, the Town Board has determined to proceed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Watertown finds that the proposed action of adopting the legislation is subject to SEQR; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the action constitutes an unlisted action under SEQR 617.2(al); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Board is the agency with jurisdiction by law to fund, approve, or directly undertake this action, and therefore, a coordinated review of the action under SEQR is neither required nor necessary.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Watertown, New York:
- Based upon the examination and consideration of the Long Environmental Assessment Form and comparison of the proposed action and criteria set forth at 617.7, no significant impact on the environment is known by the adoption of the proposed legislation.
- The Supervisor for the Town of Watertown is authorized to execute the Long Environmental Assessment Form to the effect that the Town Board is issuing a “negative declaration” under SEQR.
- A complete copy of the EAF including its negative declaration shall be maintained in the Town Clerk’s office in a file that will be readily accessible to the Public. All subsequent notices regarding the undertaking of the project as set forth in this Resolution shall state that a negative declaration has been issued.
- This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Supervisor Bartlett, and seconded by Board Member Prosser, and upon roll call vote of the Board was duly adopted as follows:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #9-2026
RESOLUTION 2 of 2026
ENACT LOCAL LAW REGARDING
Chapter 66 Prohibition of Clutter, Litter, and Debris
WHEREAS, the Town Board for the Town of Watertown, New York is interested in enacting a Local Law that will repeal and replace the currently existing Local Law regarding the prohibition of clutter, litter, and debris within the Town in accordance with the most recent laws in New York.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Watertown, New York as follows:
- The forgoing recitation is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if set forth herein.
- The Town Board hereby enacts the Local Law for Prohibition of Clutter, Litter, and Debris as Chapter 66 as being in the best interests of the Town of Watertown.
- The Supervisor for the Town of Watertown, and the Town Clerk, their respective agents and employees are hereby authorized to sign all documents and take all steps necessary to enact this legislation.
- This Legislation shall be filed with the New York State Department of State and shall become effective thereafter.
- This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Supervisor Bartlett, and seconded by Board Member Prosser, and upon roll call vote of the Board was duly adopted as follows:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #10-2026
RESOLUTION 3 of 2026
APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
WHEREAS, the Town of Watertown has adopted a Local Law regarding the Prohibition of Clutter, Litter, and Debris (the “Law”), and such Law became effective January 8, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board desires to appoint a person to administer and enforce the Law; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board has reviewed its underlying Land Use Regulations together with the law and concludes that the individual customarily performing the functions of the Town’s Zoning Officer would be the appropriate person to administer and enforce the Law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Watertown, New York resolves as follows:
- The Zoning Enforcement Officer a/k/a Zoning Officer is hereby designated as the Enforcement Officer for the Law;
- The Enforcement Officer shall familiarize herself or himself with the Law and take all steps reasonably necessary to administer and enforce the Law, including the use of the Town Engineer and/or Town Attorney to perform functions reasonably related thereto;
- This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Supervisor Bartlett, and seconded by Board Member Prosser, and upon roll call vote of the Board was duly adopted as follows:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #11-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to increase all water and sewer rents charged town district users to reflect an increase in City charges for providing water and sewer service to all district water and sewer treatment users, and
WHEREAS district fund balances are depleted due to an increase in DEC Consent orders, testing and upgrades and repairs to existing infrastructure in each district; and
WHEREAS, rates may be increased on an as-needed basis following a public hearing on the proposed increases; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED public hearings will be conducted on the proposed increase of 70 cents per unit in all water and sewer districts at 7:00 pm, (Water Districts 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and Sewer Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) on February 12, 2026 at the Town Municipal Offices, 22867 Brookside Drive, Watertown NY 13601 at which all persons will be afforded to be heard on the matter.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by Supervisor Bartlett, and seconded by Board Member Prosser, and upon roll call vote of the Board was duly adopted as follows:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #12-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered motion as to where it is necessary to increase the cost of large and small trash bags in order to generate sufficient revenue at the transfer station to offset increased pickup costs charged by the County, including a $100 per recyclable pickup, and increased disposal costs.
The price of both large and small municipal trash bags, as well as recyclable pickup, will be increased by $0.50 per bag starting immediately.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #13-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate Legal and Bond Council for the Town of Watertown for year 2026;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the law firm of Barclay Damon is hereby designated Legal and Bond Council for the year 2026 and to authorize the Supervisor to sign the necessary paperwork to facilitate the agreement.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #14-2026
RESOLUTION 4 of 2026
ROUTE 3/ROUTE 202 CONNECTOR ROAD
WHEREAS, on August 28, 2025, a majority of the Town Board of the Town of Watertown voted to move forward with a road which would eventually connect Route 3 with Route 202 in the Town of Watertown; and
WHEREAS, in order for the Town to proceed with the proposed connector road, a majority of the Town Board must direct the Town Engineer to submit a new permit application to the New York State Department of Transportation (“NYS DOT”) regarding the same; and
WHEREAS, the cost of such permit application will likely exceed $40,000.00 in engineering costs and will not guarantee approval from NYS DOT.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Board of the Town of Watertown, New York:
- The Engineer for the Town of Watertown, BCA Architects & Engineers, is authorized to prepare and submit a new permit application to the NYS DOT.
- That, if necessary, the Town Supervisor of the Town of Watertown is authorized to sign the aforementioned NYS DOT permit application once prepared by BCA.
- This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
During consideration of the motion, Supervisor Bartlett made a request to amend the proposal to remove the third “Whereas” clause, which referenced an estimated $40,000 cost to resubmit another application.
Attorney Harrienger explained that this estimate was based on a discussion with Mr. Altieri, who indicated the cost could range between $25,000 and $50,000, depending on engineering cost.
Discussion followed regarding anticipated engineering costs, which could include traffic studies, coordination with the State, and related permitting work. It was noted that some preliminary engineering costs had previously been done, but certain studies specifically traffic studies had not yet been performed.
Mr. Altieri clarified that an initial application had been submitted under the State’s previous permitting system, consisting primarily of submitted drawings. The full permit application was not completed at that time. Subsequent meetings with State representatives identified issues that required further review and revisions.
It was further noted that the State has since transitioned to a new electronic application system, and documentation previously submitted under the old system would need to be transferred and updated accordingly.
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to amend the resolution to withdraw the “Whereas Clause”:
WHEREAS, the cost of such permit application will likely exceed $40,000.00 in engineering costs and will not guarantee approval from NYS DOT.
Motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Councilwoman McClusky inquired if this permit would need to be performed again for the rest of the road.
Supervisor Bartlett stated it would not; this is for the NYS Rte. 3 connection.
Mr. Altieri clarified this permit would only be the NYS Rte. 3 connection. There would be later approvals needed with Jefferson County Highway Department for the connection the Co. Rte. 202.
A roll call vote was called:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky No
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #15-2026
Supervisor Bartlett offered a motion to adopt Resolution No. 4 of 2026, NYS Route 3/County Route 202 Connector Road, as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Council Perkins asked for clarity concerning the cost of the permitting with the State.
Attorney Harrienger clarified that removing the dollar amount does not eliminate the cost itself, but only removes the estimate from the resolution language. Any required engineering work would still need to be paid for; the amendment would simply avoid specifying the amount within the resolution.
Supervisor Bartlett expressed that including the cost figure could imply that Town taxpayer funds would be used which he stated they were not.
Supervisor Bartlett noted that if the Board preferred not to proceed with the resolution as written, an alternative approach could be to offer a simple motion directing the Town Engineer to submit a second permit application, rather than adopting the full resolution.
A roll call vote was called:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky No
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye No
MOTION #16-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish an annual schedule for all Town Council meetings to be held on a monthly basis for the Year 2026; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that all regular monthly Town Council meetings will be held the second Thursday of each month at 7:00 pm with the exception of the October which will be conducted on the 1st (first) Thursday of the month, and the November meeting shall be held on the first Thursday following the general election of 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #17 -2026
WHEREAS, Municipal Solutions has provided financial services related to the Town’s long- and short-term bond debt, including assistance with the preparation and compilation of the Town’s official statements required for the financing of municipal debt and other financial services on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize a new fee-for-service agreement for said financial services for the Fiscal Year 2026.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Supervisor is hereby authorized to execute said fee-for-service agreement between Municipal Solutions, Leroy, NY and the Town of Watertown under the terms and conditions contained within the agreement for the Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #18 -2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate bank depositories for the safekeeping and investment of Town funds for the year 2026; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Key Bank, Community Bank, and Watertown Savings Bank are hereby designated as depositories and investment of town funds for the Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #19-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate chairmen for the Town of Watertown Planning Board, and
WHEREAS, Co-Chairs Thomas Boxberger and Pamela Desormo have indicated their interest in reappointment to another term of office as Co-Chairmen of the Town Planning Board; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Thomas Boxberger and Pamela Desormo are hereby appointed as Co-Chairmen of the Town of Watertown Planning Board for the Year 2026;
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #20-2026
WHEREAS, pursuant to Town Law, it is necessary to appoint a legal firm annually to provide legal services for the Town; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Kendall, Harrienger and Burrows of Watertown NY is hereby appointed as Legal Counsel for the Town of Watertown for the Fiscal Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #21-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to appoint an Engineering Firm to represent the Town on matters requiring engineering services for the Year 2026;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the engineering firm of Bernier Carr and Associates,15 Public Square, Watertown NY is hereby appointed Engineer for the Town of Watertown for the Fiscal Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #22-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate an accounting firm to record all fiscal transactions for the Town of Watertown for a Year 2026; and
WHEREAS, the accounting firm of Crowley and Halloran of Watertown N.Y. has all the certifications and credentials to perform said duties for the Town.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the CPA Firm of Crowley and Halloran of Watertown NY is hereby appointed as accountants for the Town of Watertown for the Fiscal Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Discussion followed:
Councilman Prosser questioned whether this was the firm they were trying to get current financials from.
Supervisor Bartlett confirmed it was and they are almost caught up.
Councilwoman McClusky asked when the Board would receive monthly statements.
Supervisor Bartlett stated that progress is being made and that updated financial updates should be available by next month.
Councilman Slye inquired about the resolution he had drafted that was removed from the agenda concerning the accounting firm’s responsibility to prepare current and final financial reports in a timely manner.
He expressed concern over the lack of clear and timely financial reporting, noting that after serving on the Board for approximately one and a half years, he remained unaware of the Town’s current financial position, including outstanding obligations, available funds, and overall deficits.
Councilman Slye stated that the Board should receive regular financial status reports, at least on a quarterly basis.
Supervisor Bartlett acknowledged the concern and agreed, noting personal frustration with the difficulty of preparing budgets without complete and current financial information. It was explained that delays were partly due to logistical limitations affecting document scanning and submission, but that the intent was to ensure financial records are fully caught up.
He stated that accounting staff would be directed to bring all financial reporting up to date by the next Board meeting, so the new year could begin with an accurate accounting of the Town’s finances.
Councilman Slye discussed whether the Town has a formal contract with the accounting service provider.
Supervisor Bartlett said that has a fee-for-service arrangement that had been authorized with the firm.
Councilman Slye noted that, according to the provider, services are rendered without a formal contract. He suggested that, regardless of contract status, the Town should require at least quarterly financial reports as part of the services being paid for.
Supervisor Bartlett directed that Mr. Slye’s resolution will be placed on next month’s agenda outlining the specific reporting requirements to be provided to the accounting service, so expectations could be formally communicated.
A roll call vote was called:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett Yes
David Prosser Yes
Joanne McClusky Yes
Michael Perkins Yes
Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #23-2026
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate an official newspaper for all required legal notices and publications for the Year 2026;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; the Watertown Daily Times is hereby designated as the official newspaper for such publications for the town for the Fiscal Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #24-2026
WHEREAS, several water and sewer districts are interconnected and serviced by single meters; and
WHEREAS, from time to time it is necessary to transfer funds between districts in order to balance appropriation and revenue accounts; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Supervisor is hereby authorized to transfer funds between districts for recording and accounting purposes for the Fiscal Year 2026.
Supervisor Bartlett moved the foregoing resolution, seconded by Councilman Prosser.
Ayes All
MOTION #25-2026
WHEREAS, PIVOT Employee Assistance Service offers counseling and other services to town employees who are in need of counseling for personnel issues, including referring employees to agencies to assist employees; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to enter into a fee-for-service agreement between PIVOT and the Town of Watertown for the Fiscal Year 2026; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; the Supervisor is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the Town of Watertown for the period covering the Year 2026 at a cost of $400.00.
Ayes All
MOTION #26-2026
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Watertown, 22867 Brookside Drive, Watertown, NY 13601 hereby establishes the following as standard work days for elected and appointed officials and will report the following days worked to the New York state and Local Employees’ Retirement System based on the record of activities maintained and submitted by these officials to the clerk of this body:
Standard Days/Month
Work Day (based on Record
Title Name (Hrs/day) Term Begins/Ends of Activities)
Elected Officials:
Supervisor Joel Bartlett 7.5 1/1/2024-12/31/2027 19
R11894153
Town Clerk Pamela Desormo 7.5 1/1/2024-12/31/2027 25
R10806031 -5650
Highway Superintendent 8
Ted Clement 1/1/2024-12/31/2027 25
R11874736 – 7289
Justice Matthew Porter 6 1/1/2023-12/31/2026 4.96
R11476649 – 9992
Appointed Officials:
Zoning Board of Appeals
Brandon Cooney 6 1/1/23-12/31/2027 .17
R12056413
Planning Board Member
Pamela Desormo 6 1/1/2022-12/31/2026 .34
R10706031 – 5650
A motion to adopt the foregoing resolution was offered by Supervisor Bartlett and seconded by Councilmember Prosser, and upon a roll call vote was adopted as follows:
Supervisor: Joel Bartlett Yes
Councilman: David Prosser Yes
Councilwoman: Joanne McClusky Yes
Councilman: Michael Perkins Yes
Councilman: Robert Slye Yes
MOTION #27-2026
Supervisor Bartlett moved to pay the following abstracts as audited.
Utilities paid prior to the meeting
General Vouchers # 247 to 249 Total $ 11,054.10
Highway Vouchers # 196 to 196 Total $ 23,470.70
Spec. Dist. Vchrs. # 148 to 148 Total $ 8,746.75
Vouchers approved for monthly meeting
General Vouchers # 1 to 12 Total $ 20,818.69
Highway Vouchers # 1 to 14 Total $ 43,928.27
Spec. Dist. Vchrs. # 1 to 8 Total $ 169,854.84
Councilmember Prosser seconded the motion.
Ayes All
Superintendent Clement gave the Board an update regarding recent water system communication issues between the tank and the Washington Street pump house. It was reported that the system failed to communicate tank levels, requiring him to manually monitor and operate the system for approximately three days.
Bob Boliver, BCA coordinated with Aqualogics, who inspected the control panels and identified the issue. While the system is currently operating through a temporary workaround, it was reported that several communication components are obsolete and no longer manufactured. Aqualogics recommended that the Town seriously consider upgrading the communication equipment, including three control boxes and related components.
Mike Aleiri noted that similar outdated PLC (programmable logic controller) systems exist at the Industrial Park lift station on the sewer side. Discussion followed regarding the possibility of integrating and upgrading PLC communications across both water and sewer systems.
Board members discussed the benefit of enabling remote monitoring, allowing tank levels to be viewed via phone or tablet, which would reduce the need for staff to travel between facilities solely to check levels.
It was reported that a vendor is preparing a cost estimate for cellular communication upgrades and updated control equipment.
Discussion followed regarding available funding within Water District No. 4. It was noted that the water district extension project came in under budget, leaving unused funds due to favorable bid results. The Board discussed the possibility of reallocating or tying eligible communication system upgrades to the existing project to avoid forfeiting unspent grant funds, subject to approval requirements.
An update was also provided regarding solid waste equipment. Superintendent Clement reported that the Town’s packer truck is currently operational, but concerns were raised about continuity of service if the packer body is removed for installation on another truck. It was noted that no rental packers are available locally. As a contingency, he proposed renting a 40-yard dumpster to maintain operations if needed during the transition.
Additional discussion concerned a potential grader (Gradall) transaction, including a trade-in and purchase through a vendor. Questions were raised regarding the procurement method, including whether the transaction would require bidding, qualify as an arm’s-length transaction, or be eligible through a County or cooperative purchasing program. It was noted that previous similar equipment transactions had been handled through trade-in arrangements with the same vendor.
Supervisor Bartlett indicated the need to review the current budget to determine whether funds were allocated for equipment purchases or repairs and to confirm the appropriate legal procurement process before proceeding.
MOTION #28-2026
Councilman Prosser moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:16 pm seconded by Supervisor Bartlett.
Ayes All
_____________________________
Pamela D. Desormo, Town Clerk